Sammitr congratulated the justice discrimination lawsuit flop “enlightened free-Grantham motyo.” morphological difference measure, together with the process of the law?
The litigation case with Lord Grantham motyo Abbot of Wat Phra dhammakaya The accused, according to the arrest warrant for money laundering conspiracy togetherand together are of the pirates. Under the investigation of the Department of special investigation (DSI). Gen. Phaibun worth the nickname Sammitr congratulated the Justice said that the DSI request this, it is the duty, Lord Grantham motyo arrival, acknowledged the allegations, but it has never been successful.
So it must be the duty of the justice system to handle finding ways, accused took the decision based on the facts and the law. Not a nest, but network and lawyers tried to use to organise a press conference outside the arena, getting to know their opponents in pure which to lawyer should bring their clients into the process of the law.
With examples of enlightened Buddha, independent owner WA sawat Oh least media reception in comparison that appears on any part. Emphasized that the past nevertwo, standard or option potbat because of their Buddhist case, independent verification of the Chase. Have all the lawsuits, the comparison with the lawsuit of Lord Grantham motyo trying to avoid fighting, according to the legal process.